Differently from regular industrial porn, Realcore has a much wider palette of expression, and often decoding an image isn’t as immediate, or as obvious. Take this photo, for example:
There’s a picture in it, and there’s this unusual human type (unusual for the classic image of men in porn, but quite common) in what looks like his home – possibly with the door open? It’s day time, and this is a frame from a video. Was it a solo performance or someone else was filming? Was it meant to be a Tribute to the guy in the small picture? If so, who posted this frame in the older men newsgroup: this guy, the recipient or someone else? Was this position requested (maybe by the man in the small pic)? And if he’s about to do what I think, shouldn’t he take his glasses off?
I haven’t been posting here lately, sorry about that. But I’ve been searching for pictures as usual, also because my Rolling Stone Italy column on Alt Sex (in italian) is changing. Starting with the january issue it’ll be called Alt Sex 2.0 and it will be just images, perhaps 4 or 5 per issue – one page. This is great for a number of reasons: it makes sense conceptually, it’s gonna look great, it isn’t language based (so you can enjoy it too) and it will hopefully follow the excellent photographic tradition of the magazine. Obviously I cannot publish everything. There are some limits: erect penises and spread vaginas. I’m told this is where the world draws the line as to what is porn and what isn’t. I can certainly live without them, but my readers will miss fantastic images such as this one, or the one below (found in the bestiality newsgroup; note the very tiny horse vagina picture placed right in the middle).
