Skip to content
Archive of posts filed under the World premiere topic.

Mirror mirror

It’s now clear that digital photography has irreversibly changed our relationship with pictures. I would add that Photoshop (on which I’ve written before, also here) has intensely changed that relationship as well, from adding captions to making fake celebrity images, right up to extreme photoshopping. Take this one (found in the alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.oral Newsgroup) for example.


(click to enlarge)

It looks like an early ’80s picture “revamped” in Photoshop. I find this mirror-image extravaganza almost physically unpleasant: the overall color tone, the girl’s expression and hair, the dizzying frame – multiplied a thousand times, some kind of nausea-inducing porno-fractal. And I wonder: why did someone create this image (which I believe took some time to make)? Is it sexually arousing (for blonde fetishists or fractal nerds)? Is it decorative (perhaps an impossible wallpaper)? Is it a devotional image of The Secret Church of the Holy Double Penis (in many traditions, from Roman Catholic to Tibetan, symmetry is considered divine)? As usual with me, too many questions and no answers (that’s why I don’t call myself a theoretician).

Corns & Phalluses

The purpose of this page is to present examples of smut that describe some aspect of Realcore and have some of that special, often involuntary, quality that struck me the first times I found this stuff online – and still does. Take this picture, posted some time ago in a foot fetish newsgroup (I can’t remember which one – there are dozens):

It’s a Point-of-view shot, taken by someone visibly concentrated in something else. Still, not only it’s a perfect photo, but depicts the joys of an act that wouldn’t have occurred to me, but of which I can see the point. If you’re a foot fetishist, or a lube enthusiast, this must be heaven. It could even be that this is the first photo ever taken in this position, from this angle: it’s certainly the first one I’ve seen – and believe me, “I’ve seen things you people wouldn’t believe”.

As usual, I can’t help noticing the actual beauty of the photo itself, in glorious lo-res (it could even be a video frame): a maybe blasphemous, contemporary, absurd, digital (but very fleshy) Lingam.

Bassoon Bukkake

As anyone who’s tried to navigate japanese porn knows (and as I’ve written here before), it’s a true cultural experience – in many ways alien and incomprehensible. Such for me is the case of this DVD, of which all I know is this image, found in a newsgroup some weeks ago.

orchprn

By the way they hold their instruments it looks like some of them can actually play. So this could be some kind of new classical porn where they have sex while playing Wagner. Or perhaps they don’t have sex at all, and they just play naked for 140 minutes: in both cases I’d love to see this – just to say I did.

Yes, we have no bananas

I’ve always been fascinated by the relationship between Art and Science: this is how I became a Pierre-Joseph Redouté and John James Audubon fan. Recently I came to realize that there is also a relationship between Porno and Science, and Apophallation is a good example:

“Apophallation is a technique resorted to by some species of air-breathing land slugs such as Limax maximus and Ariolimax spp. In these species of hermaphroditic terrestrial gastropod mollusks, after mating, if the slugs cannot successfully separate, a deliberate amputating of the penis takes place.” (from Wikipedia, read the full entry)

When I discovered the word Apophallation I made a little search, and came up with this result. The page, made by Brooke L W Miller in 2004, is called “Home of the Slug Love” and it’s hosted on the UCSC .edu website: “I am studying evolutionary biology and I became interested in Banana Slugs because I feel that they are good organisms to study sexual conflict between hermaphroditic mating partners.” What follows can only be described as Slug Porno – see it for yourself: there are even videos, aptly rated XXX.

There is also a (mispelled) Newsgroup for this, alt.binaries.apophalation, that yesterday had 290 files posted. Mostly .rar files – parts of some movie which I didn’t download (you’ve got to draw the line somewhere, and apophallation seems a bit beyond). But of course, if you’ve been here before, you’ve already seen some Slug love.

The Pin-Up King

As I said recently in a short text (available here), I believe that Porno is in many ways the new Rock’n'roll. In the final paragraph I wrote: “What’s more, if this is true, then Irving Klaw is like Chuck Berry…”

Klaw began his career as a fetish photographer in the 40s, when this genre was known as Damsel in distress. He went on to photograph many girls, in bondage or otherwise, including the queen of Pin-up girls Bettie Page. In the 50s he moved on to film loops: “These featured striptease acts and an assortment of fetishistic subjects based on special requests from his clientele. Titles such as Riding the Human Pony Girl, Bondage in Leather Harness, and Booted Amazon Fights Again depicted women in skimpy lingerie and high heels engaging in elaborate bondage, cat-fights, spanking, and slave training.” (from Wikipedia)

Klaw was the first fetish film-maker whose work was well known and distributed; so we could say that he invented the fetish film language, so relevant to porn (Realcore or otherwise) today. Some of his solutions (such as employing wide angle lenses to capture the whole ambience) have become standards, and many of his actresses, like Page, Blaze Starr and Tempest Storm (all 50s Strip-tease stars) still have a huge following today, and still stand as powerful women figures – also thanks to Irving Klaw’s skills.

In the mid 50s  he was targeted as a corruptor of youth by a US Senate Subcommittee that linked pornography to juvenile delinquency: “Because of the political and social pressure he faced, Klaw eventually quit the business, and burned his negatives. (It is estimated that more than 80% of the negatives were destroyed.)”

You can find the whole Irving Klaw’s story in his excellent Wikipedia entry, along with some links to relevant sites – including Klaw’s own production company, Movie Star News, now run by his nephew.

There first

I’ll be at the Berlin Porn Film Festival again this year, presenting two early BDSM movies (24.10.08, 18.30, Eiszeit 2 kino). This is my presentation text:

There First
Presenting The “Slavesex” And “Pain” Movie Series

It’s very easy to be kinky in 2008: there are clubs, associations and dungeons for rent; there’s an ample and very varied filmography, covering just about any kink you can imagine; there are websites to educate and entertain you, made by real practitioners for genuinely interested people. But there was a time, not long ago, in which being into very intense kinds of love, like BDSM or extreme fetishes, was very much a niche thing. In the early eighties, the beginning of the golden era of VHS (and the shift from movie theaters to VCRs), fetish cinema was very underground. Video cameras were still low quality and most of the porno sold on VHS tapes was still shot on film.

Porno at the time was mostly fiction based, it had a plot and – unfortunately – actual acting bits. The editing, and sometimes dubbing, was often so extreme (and blatantly unlikely) that it was hard to get any feel for the situation: lousy dialogue, genital close ups, screams, the customary cumshot (not yet facial) and little else. Some german producers, like Dino, sometimes inserted some different action (like anal, pissing, or light BDSM) in mainstream features just to spice things up.

Two of the first widely distributed BDSM series, Slavesex and Pain, were spoken in German, and mostly featured a couple, plus occasionally someone else. Their screen names were Anita, or Anita Feller, or Martina S (for Sklavin), and Master Günther. It’s very difficult to gather informations about dates, but i believe it was in the early eighties. These movies were radically different from anything else on the market at that time, as far as I can tell. They had no music but strictly live sound, little or no editing, almost no close ups but much wider angles; they weren’t shot on movie sets but in what looked like a well equipped dungeon. The people weren’t “actors”, and you could tell right away: which porn actress would be hanged by her tits – and look like she’s into it? The movies obviously showed a dynamic, a relationship, and an action that would probably happen even if the camera wasn’t there. The shooting style was more documentaristic than porno, and it would occasionally zoom in to capture faces, not crotches. The overall package, from the stark boxes to the bare credits and the abrupt ends, smelled like underground, although it was very obvious that these people weren’t post-punks, didn’t listen to heavy metal or wear rubber in public: they were very much into BDSM, but regular people otherwise.

It’s hard to calculate the impact of these films on the BDSM scene, but i believe it’s huge. At the time, this was the only credible BDSM one could see in action, comfortably at home, even in smaller towns; and if it’s true that porno educates (or miseducates) people about sex, this is 10 times true for the so called niche porno. So one could guess that they showed first what BDSM (and more) was about to a large number of people in the world (including myself).

Anita/Martina then moved on to a brief but very varied solo career, appearing in quite a few German and Dutch productions during the second half of the 80s/early 90s (again, it’s very hard to gather informations on dates). She never did straight porn thou: her parts were always fetish, or outright kinky. Sometimes extremely so. There are movies, both in the Slavesex/Pain series and in othe productions, in which she performs things that probably had never been filmed before (including genuine tears and kisses on the cheeks – unheard of in porno), and some of those performances still hold as extreme after so many years (eons, if you consider the digital revolution). But this lady had class to burn, a style which to me is still unsurpassed today; at times she did look kinky, very extreme, even way over the top, but never gross or sloppy, or even nasty: she looked extra natural, just the way it should be. This woman’s filmography reads like a history of alternative sexuality of the last 15 years – but 15 years before.

The two films presented here belong to the early Slavesex/Pain series. They are shown as an example of seminal porno, as amazing films in their own right and to give credit and visibility to authors that opened a way that is very, very much in fashion in 2008 – but that they walked 25 years ago.

Walk-by shooting

We all know that even in this globalized world, the Japanese retain an exotic quality to the western eye. This is especially true in pornography, and there are some genres that even have japanese names – like the ubiquitous Bukkake (which of course has its own Wikipedia entry). In Japan some people certainly have a fetish for body fluids, and the variations I have seen are truly endless (for a journey in the labyrinthine world of japanese porn genres, Japanzine has a Dictionary of Japan Sex). Another very big fetish (in Japan and elsewhere) is forcing: forced fondling (very often on packed trains, usually by a mob of guys), forced orgasms and of course forced Bukkake. This goes one step further:

jpblcsmn.jpg

I just hope this video was staged, and the lady with sunglasses knew what to expect. In this case she’s quite an actress: the WTF expression on her face is very, very realistic.

Where is Martina S?

A little quest this time. I’m looking for this german lady, perhaps the greatest fetish film star of the 70es/80es and a ground-breaker in many areas. She appeared under various names: Anita Feller, Anita F, Lady Anita, Martina S, also to match the role she played in the movie.

She was incredibly beautiful, and had a long and varied career, often appearing with her partner Günther. You can find her in some amazing early german BDSM series, like Slavesex or Pain; then she worked with Dino, a well known director who made mainstream porno often with a fetish twist. As far as I know, this woman’s elegance is unmatched in the history of porno, although she has been the very first to perform extreme stuff on camera, including watersports, scat, bestiality, outdoor, and of course BDSM – almost always very involved but never raunchy or tasteless, despite the sometimes very extreme play she was involved in.

As it often happens, at one point (very hard to say when, but sometimes in the late 80es) she disappeared. The European Girls Adult Film Database has a page on her (with another picture), that only lists her work with Dino. Does anyone of you know her whereabouts? I’d love to interview her – also for this blog, of course.

Update: I wrote about Martina here.

Size matters

One of the trademarks of classic Hardcore porno was the genital closeup shot; sometimes it looked horrible (especially when prints or movies had too much red in it, giving the image a butchery quality) but it was always there. Realcore porn, and new porno in general, seems to be more concerned with the ambience than with certifying that penetration is taking place: shots have a much wider angle, and details have a meaning within the context. But of course there are exeptions, sometimes quite remarkable.

jstnps.jpg

Justnips.com is a commercial website (one-time billing, $79 subscription for 180 days). Is it all devoted to nipples? “Although our site is JustNips.Com we photograph & videotape most models nude from head to toe (& everything in between)”. I haven’t visited the website but it looks kind of plain. I wouldn’t say the same of this image, posted a few weeks ago in a nipples Usenet Newsgroup. Notice the “repost freely – no modifications” disclaimer, almost a CC license.

XXX bouquet

Very often, in pornography of all kind, there’s a gloryfication of the penis: it’s centerstage, well lit (especially in mainstream images), and often the center of all attentions. Of all the variations in penis portrayal I’ve seen in my life, nothing comes even close to this:

flwrs.jpg

It’s part of a series with flowers and shells adorning the same dick. It was posted, about 2 years ago, in the alt.binaries.pictures.cocks newsgroup.