Skip to content
Archive of posts filed under the Real thinking topic.

Victorian webcam

Here’s a (bad) photo I’ve taken at the Musee Mechanique in San Francisco. It’s a 1920es (I believe) viewing machine, and what you’ll see is promised right there on the box.

It explains much better that I can one aspect of Realcore. Obviously we know what she does on her days on, right? We could safely assume that, on the other days, she behaves like any other person. But she’s an exotic belly dancer, so she somehow has a double appeal: onstage, where she visibly shakes her belly for everybody, and on her day off – where we can dream that she leads a wild, untamed, sexually frenzied existence. If it sounds silly to you, remember that in the golden age of exotic dances (as references, Ziegfeld was active between 1907 and 1931, Bettie Page between 1950 and ’57) men would literally go insane after the wonderful (and liberated) stars that would pass by their town with a dance troupe. And I believe the real reason wasn’t their onstage acts, but the atmosphere of liberation and possibilities (as opposed to the strict moral rules people had to live with) that emanated from these women.

It’s also, in a way, the same mechanism of gossip: see what Lindsay Lohan does on her day off. I bet the belly dancer had a far more interesting story to tell.

Sesso alternativo

As I wrote some time ago, I have a column called Alt Sex on the italian Rolling Stone. I finally managed to collect all the articles (29 so far), complete with images, on my italian website. Updated monthly. (Image courtesy of Australian Sun and Health, circa 1970)

Realcore interview

There’s a good interview by Louise Bak with me on Realcore in the current issue of Toro Magazine. Check out also the interview image gallery, with some new pics I found (such as this one).

But good at porn

When I say that porno is becoming a more intricate and fascinating universe than it has ever been, I also refer to websites like lameatnames.com, whose page begins like this: “for us, our basic idea is: we’re lame at names. we like to find amateur erotic pictures on the Internet. most of the time they’re not really sexy. they’re fun cause they show people’s life and what erotic means to them.” Lovely, and the pics are right.

Porn: the new Rock’n'roll

I’ve been saying for years that Sex is the next Politics. If this is true, then Porno must be the next Rock’n'roll. I explain both ideas in a brief article published on sergiomessina.com.

There first

I’ll be at the Berlin Porn Film Festival again this year, presenting two early BDSM movies (24.10.08, 18.30, Eiszeit 2 kino). This is my presentation text:

There First
Presenting The “Slavesex” And “Pain” Movie Series

It’s very easy to be kinky in 2008: there are clubs, associations and dungeons for rent; there’s an ample and very varied filmography, covering just about any kink you can imagine; there are websites to educate and entertain you, made by real practitioners for genuinely interested people. But there was a time, not long ago, in which being into very intense kinds of love, like BDSM or extreme fetishes, was very much a niche thing. In the early eighties, the beginning of the golden era of VHS (and the shift from movie theaters to VCRs), fetish cinema was very underground. Video cameras were still low quality and most of the porno sold on VHS tapes was still shot on film.

Porno at the time was mostly fiction based, it had a plot and – unfortunately – actual acting bits. The editing, and sometimes dubbing, was often so extreme (and blatantly unlikely) that it was hard to get any feel for the situation: lousy dialogue, genital close ups, screams, the customary cumshot (not yet facial) and little else. Some german producers, like Dino, sometimes inserted some different action (like anal, pissing, or light BDSM) in mainstream features just to spice things up.

Two of the first widely distributed BDSM series, Slavesex and Pain, were spoken in German, and mostly featured a couple, plus occasionally someone else. Their screen names were Anita, or Anita Feller, or Martina S (for Sklavin), and Master Günther. It’s very difficult to gather informations about dates, but i believe it was in the early eighties. These movies were radically different from anything else on the market at that time, as far as I can tell. They had no music but strictly live sound, little or no editing, almost no close ups but much wider angles; they weren’t shot on movie sets but in what looked like a well equipped dungeon. The people weren’t “actors”, and you could tell right away: which porn actress would be hanged by her tits – and look like she’s into it? The movies obviously showed a dynamic, a relationship, and an action that would probably happen even if the camera wasn’t there. The shooting style was more documentaristic than porno, and it would occasionally zoom in to capture faces, not crotches. The overall package, from the stark boxes to the bare credits and the abrupt ends, smelled like underground, although it was very obvious that these people weren’t post-punks, didn’t listen to heavy metal or wear rubber in public: they were very much into BDSM, but regular people otherwise.

It’s hard to calculate the impact of these films on the BDSM scene, but i believe it’s huge. At the time, this was the only credible BDSM one could see in action, comfortably at home, even in smaller towns; and if it’s true that porno educates (or miseducates) people about sex, this is 10 times true for the so called niche porno. So one could guess that they showed first what BDSM (and more) was about to a large number of people in the world (including myself).

Anita/Martina then moved on to a brief but very varied solo career, appearing in quite a few German and Dutch productions during the second half of the 80s/early 90s (again, it’s very hard to gather informations on dates). She never did straight porn thou: her parts were always fetish, or outright kinky. Sometimes extremely so. There are movies, both in the Slavesex/Pain series and in othe productions, in which she performs things that probably had never been filmed before (including genuine tears and kisses on the cheeks – unheard of in porno), and some of those performances still hold as extreme after so many years (eons, if you consider the digital revolution). But this lady had class to burn, a style which to me is still unsurpassed today; at times she did look kinky, very extreme, even way over the top, but never gross or sloppy, or even nasty: she looked extra natural, just the way it should be. This woman’s filmography reads like a history of alternative sexuality of the last 15 years – but 15 years before.

The two films presented here belong to the early Slavesex/Pain series. They are shown as an example of seminal porno, as amazing films in their own right and to give credit and visibility to authors that opened a way that is very, very much in fashion in 2008 – but that they walked 25 years ago.

Netporn reader

It’s available online, as a PDF document, C’Lick Me: A Netporn Studies Reader, edited by Katrien Jacobs, Marije Janssen, Matteo Pasquinelli: “An anthology that collects the best materials of two years debate: from The Art and Politics of Netporn conference held in 2005 in Amsterdam to the 2007 C’Lick Me festival in Paradiso, Amsterdam. C’Lick Me opens the field of “Internet pornology”. I’m in it too.

The real Richardson

Terry Richardson is a well known fashion and publicity photographer: he’s worked for Gucci, Sisley, Miu Miu, Levi’s and many other. His images have appeared in Vogue, Dazed and Confused, GQ, Harper’s Bazaar, “as well as a host of worldwide publications too numerous to mention.” He also does portraits: Daniel Day Lewis, Faye Dunaway, Leonardo DiCaprio, Vincent Gallo, Tom Ford, Sharon Stone, 50 Cent, Kanye West, Nicolas Cage, Dennis Hopper and many other celebrities (check his website for some samples). Yet self made porno seems to be in his heart:

“Kibosh is the most important book of my career. This is my life’s work.

From the age of 16 when I first started to photograph for fun and then as a profession, I have always thought of Kibosh as the summary of my career. Kibosh is my book, the most intimate part of me as a photographer.

I believe that the phrase, “I would never ask anyone to do something that I myself would not do” from the introduction of this book, shows the profound respect that I have for the people who collaborated in the realization of this work, which for me is so important. For the realization of Kibosh I stopped working, for months I dedicated myself entirely to collecting the photos and planning the lay-out. I wanted it to be understood how important this book is for me, that no detail had been left out and that everything had to be how I had always imagined it. To tell people about yourself using images is something that requires time, lots of time, perhaps a lifetime, and this is Kibosh.”

Kibosh (printed in 2.000 copies, € 250, on sale only through the website) features very realcore images of Richardson and his partners that, despite his amazing professional background, manage to retain that special quality that “real” images always have. Kibosh is on exhibit in Milan. (Thanks to Andrea for the tip)

The Glory Hole reference book

I found this very interesting essay about the Glory Hole, subject of many Realcore pictures, complete with explicative photos. It’s by Don Anderson, and it’s called The Force that Through the Wall Drives the Penis: The Becomings and Desiring-Machines of Glory Hole Sex. It explains very well what a Glory Hole is and it includes some interesting first hand (pun not intended) information; for example about a “place (that) actually had a video-feed of the parking lot as one of the channels on the arcade so patrons inside a booth could watch the parking lot and see people parking and entering the store. This way a person waiting in a booth for a partner can see if anyone is coming in whom they may find attractive.”

Don Anderson’s point of view is admirable: “Part ethnography, part theoretical inquiry, my research explores how video arcades in adult video and book stores provide a location where desire is nomadic and able to be freely expressed outside socially constructed identities.” Both practical and theoretical: excellent.