Skip to content
Archive of posts filed under the Porn culture topic.

The Story so far

Being The Porno Man, I often hear people’s (mostly interesting) opinions on the subject. A remark I sometimes come across (usually coming from people that seem to be interested only in the cultural aspects of pornography) is that today’s smut doesn’t have stories anymore. I believe this is a purely proustian comment: they remember their mythical past porn, that had many things going for it but seldom the storylines. I can remember just one porno movie where the screenplay actually made a functional difference: Gerard Damiano’s The Devil in Miss Jones (1973). Perhaps what they mean is that they’d like stories, or plots, or at least some kind of background information. In this case they should be happy: today’s porn, especially amateur material, is full of clues, information (often involuntary) – and it’s even possible to follow the real life adventures of people as they happen. Yes, much as in a reality show, but better.

A question I also often hear is what is the future of porn, and this weblog is also somehow a long, articulate answer to that question. But as far as Industrial porno, I believe it’s gonna look somehow like Tnaflix (one of the latest permutations of the Youporn, Pornotube business plan), but with ads like Hulu. There are many clues to this, the biggest one in my opinion being the way Music (another very emotional and personal product) works today. Rarely one wants the whole album (i.e. the whole film). Often people just want the hits (i.e. the climatic scenes, such as the cumshots), or some special song that for some reason they like (i.e. the Fetish bits). Compilations are very popular, and playlists are obviously the albums of the future; just like Industrial porn today is mostly made of disjointed scenes unified by a practice (cumshot, anal, ecc.) or a feature (skin color, big tits, ecc.). Hopefully someone in the future will start to make actual full lenght movies that include explicit sexual elements, such as some of the Destricted material – but as to 2009 the industry state of the art is still the plumber, UPS and the gardener.

PS: A meaningful 2010 to you all.

(Thanks to Daniel Dietzel for the tip)

But good at porn

When I say that porno is becoming a more intricate and fascinating universe than it has ever been, I also refer to websites like lameatnames.com, whose page begins like this: “for us, our basic idea is: we’re lame at names. we like to find amateur erotic pictures on the Internet. most of the time they’re not really sexy. they’re fun cause they show people’s life and what erotic means to them.” Lovely, and the pics are right.

The politics of stripping

I found this picture in the Vintage Usenet Newsgroup. My guess is that it was taken during one of the frequent crackdowns on obscenity that took place in the US during the 50s. Probably the word “Burlesque” was targeted, but this is just my guess (and you can put yours in the comments).

Still, as I believe sex is like politics, I like the idea of sexual demonstrations, with marching and signs (my favorite today would be: “Missionary is killing sex!“). For a historical perspective you can read Kitty Klaw’s History of Burlesque Theatre.

The Pin-Up King

As I said recently in a short text (available here), I believe that Porno is in many ways the new Rock’n'roll. In the final paragraph I wrote: “What’s more, if this is true, then Irving Klaw is like Chuck Berry…”

Klaw began his career as a fetish photographer in the 40s, when this genre was known as Damsel in distress. He went on to photograph many girls, in bondage or otherwise, including the queen of Pin-up girls Bettie Page. In the 50s he moved on to film loops: “These featured striptease acts and an assortment of fetishistic subjects based on special requests from his clientele. Titles such as Riding the Human Pony Girl, Bondage in Leather Harness, and Booted Amazon Fights Again depicted women in skimpy lingerie and high heels engaging in elaborate bondage, cat-fights, spanking, and slave training.” (from Wikipedia)

Klaw was the first fetish film-maker whose work was well known and distributed; so we could say that he invented the fetish film language, so relevant to porn (Realcore or otherwise) today. Some of his solutions (such as employing wide angle lenses to capture the whole ambience) have become standards, and many of his actresses, like Page, Blaze Starr and Tempest Storm (all 50s Strip-tease stars) still have a huge following today, and still stand as powerful women figures – also thanks to Irving Klaw’s skills.

In the mid 50s  he was targeted as a corruptor of youth by a US Senate Subcommittee that linked pornography to juvenile delinquency: “Because of the political and social pressure he faced, Klaw eventually quit the business, and burned his negatives. (It is estimated that more than 80% of the negatives were destroyed.)”

You can find the whole Irving Klaw’s story in his excellent Wikipedia entry, along with some links to relevant sites – including Klaw’s own production company, Movie Star News, now run by his nephew.

Berlin Festival trailer

Here’s the trailer of the Berlin Porn Film Festival – almost a videoclip:

There first

I’ll be at the Berlin Porn Film Festival again this year, presenting two early BDSM movies (24.10.08, 18.30, Eiszeit 2 kino). This is my presentation text:

There First
Presenting The “Slavesex” And “Pain” Movie Series

It’s very easy to be kinky in 2008: there are clubs, associations and dungeons for rent; there’s an ample and very varied filmography, covering just about any kink you can imagine; there are websites to educate and entertain you, made by real practitioners for genuinely interested people. But there was a time, not long ago, in which being into very intense kinds of love, like BDSM or extreme fetishes, was very much a niche thing. In the early eighties, the beginning of the golden era of VHS (and the shift from movie theaters to VCRs), fetish cinema was very underground. Video cameras were still low quality and most of the porno sold on VHS tapes was still shot on film.

Porno at the time was mostly fiction based, it had a plot and – unfortunately – actual acting bits. The editing, and sometimes dubbing, was often so extreme (and blatantly unlikely) that it was hard to get any feel for the situation: lousy dialogue, genital close ups, screams, the customary cumshot (not yet facial) and little else. Some german producers, like Dino, sometimes inserted some different action (like anal, pissing, or light BDSM) in mainstream features just to spice things up.

Two of the first widely distributed BDSM series, Slavesex and Pain, were spoken in German, and mostly featured a couple, plus occasionally someone else. Their screen names were Anita, or Anita Feller, or Martina S (for Sklavin), and Master Günther. It’s very difficult to gather informations about dates, but i believe it was in the early eighties. These movies were radically different from anything else on the market at that time, as far as I can tell. They had no music but strictly live sound, little or no editing, almost no close ups but much wider angles; they weren’t shot on movie sets but in what looked like a well equipped dungeon. The people weren’t “actors”, and you could tell right away: which porn actress would be hanged by her tits – and look like she’s into it? The movies obviously showed a dynamic, a relationship, and an action that would probably happen even if the camera wasn’t there. The shooting style was more documentaristic than porno, and it would occasionally zoom in to capture faces, not crotches. The overall package, from the stark boxes to the bare credits and the abrupt ends, smelled like underground, although it was very obvious that these people weren’t post-punks, didn’t listen to heavy metal or wear rubber in public: they were very much into BDSM, but regular people otherwise.

It’s hard to calculate the impact of these films on the BDSM scene, but i believe it’s huge. At the time, this was the only credible BDSM one could see in action, comfortably at home, even in smaller towns; and if it’s true that porno educates (or miseducates) people about sex, this is 10 times true for the so called niche porno. So one could guess that they showed first what BDSM (and more) was about to a large number of people in the world (including myself).

Anita/Martina then moved on to a brief but very varied solo career, appearing in quite a few German and Dutch productions during the second half of the 80s/early 90s (again, it’s very hard to gather informations on dates). She never did straight porn thou: her parts were always fetish, or outright kinky. Sometimes extremely so. There are movies, both in the Slavesex/Pain series and in othe productions, in which she performs things that probably had never been filmed before (including genuine tears and kisses on the cheeks – unheard of in porno), and some of those performances still hold as extreme after so many years (eons, if you consider the digital revolution). But this lady had class to burn, a style which to me is still unsurpassed today; at times she did look kinky, very extreme, even way over the top, but never gross or sloppy, or even nasty: she looked extra natural, just the way it should be. This woman’s filmography reads like a history of alternative sexuality of the last 15 years – but 15 years before.

The two films presented here belong to the early Slavesex/Pain series. They are shown as an example of seminal porno, as amazing films in their own right and to give credit and visibility to authors that opened a way that is very, very much in fashion in 2008 – but that they walked 25 years ago.

Where is Martina S?

A little quest this time. I’m looking for this german lady, perhaps the greatest fetish film star of the 70es/80es and a ground-breaker in many areas. She appeared under various names: Anita Feller, Anita F, Lady Anita, Martina S, also to match the role she played in the movie.

She was incredibly beautiful, and had a long and varied career, often appearing with her partner Günther. You can find her in some amazing early german BDSM series, like Slavesex or Pain; then she worked with Dino, a well known director who made mainstream porno often with a fetish twist. As far as I know, this woman’s elegance is unmatched in the history of porno, although she has been the very first to perform extreme stuff on camera, including watersports, scat, bestiality, outdoor, and of course BDSM – almost always very involved but never raunchy or tasteless, despite the sometimes very extreme play she was involved in.

As it often happens, at one point (very hard to say when, but sometimes in the late 80es) she disappeared. The European Girls Adult Film Database has a page on her (with another picture), that only lists her work with Dino. Does anyone of you know her whereabouts? I’d love to interview her – also for this blog, of course.

Update: I wrote about Martina here.

Netporn reader

It’s available online, as a PDF document, C’Lick Me: A Netporn Studies Reader, edited by Katrien Jacobs, Marije Janssen, Matteo Pasquinelli: “An anthology that collects the best materials of two years debate: from The Art and Politics of Netporn conference held in 2005 in Amsterdam to the 2007 C’Lick Me festival in Paradiso, Amsterdam. C’Lick Me opens the field of “Internet pornology”. I’m in it too.

Prehistory of Netporn

The word Amateur in connection to Porno has always been used. But in the early days of Netporn it was popularised along with another one, Action. Amateur Action (AA) has been the most popular porno BBS ever, and it has an interesting history. Launched in 1991 by Robert and Carleen Thomas, for a few years AA has been the prime source of fetish porno online (this was before the browser was invented). So, in this case, amateur didn’t mean unprofessional (in a good or derogatory way), but it referred to non mainstream practices such as fetishes, bestiality and BDSM (although AA also carried mainstream pornography). Interesting, because today, as you can see in this blog, amateur porno (what I call Realcore) still often deals with fringe sexualities. AA distribuited scans from european mags in GIF format (Jpeg was introduced in 1994); at the peak of its fame it had over 18.000 images in stock, and over 3.500 members at $ 69 per year. It was shut down by the police in 1994 (using a controversial setup described here), and the Thomasses were sentenced to three years of prison. It’s the very first porn bust of the digital age, and it was widely commented upon by many civil liberties organizations, including the prestigious Electronic Frontier Foundation. In this page you can find several links about the trial; this is the EFF archive on the case. In 2000, Robert Thomas (who apparently earned over $ 800.000 with AA) lost another legal battle: he was denied the right to the domain name amateuraction.com (that today belongs to a fetish DVD dealer), as well as to the expression itself, now a registered trademark.

Since the shut-down, AA scans have been countlessly exchanged and redistribuited by users and commercial sites. Today, to find original AA GIFs (none of which, I suspect, were authorised by the actual © owners) is very rare. Not only the expression Amateur Action has become an omnipresent tag in porn sites (making searches very difficult), but credits on images seem to change constantly as they move from site to site. They are still occasionally exchanged on the Usenet, especially in the vintage groups. The image on the right (cropped in order to protect this site) is still in the original format, and follows the traditional AA naming system: AA-, followed by the progressive number (to respect the DOS 8 character limit for file names).

Porno with style

Before late ’95/early ’96, when digital cameras became more common, porno on the web was mostly made of scans from magazines. Some of the most active uploaders (in a time when scanners were still rare and geeky) became stars, like Hamish or Jumbo (while the other material came from the BBSs, like the legendary Amateur Action). Much of that porno still survives in the Newsgroups: the alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.vintage group is a bottomless mine of retro porn, from ancient b/w prints (often stolen from Ebay) to the early www scans, like this one:

The original photo should be late ’60es/early ’70es northern european porn. It’s a Jumbo scan (marked at top right), probably made before 1995. For today’s standards it’s a very unusual image, full of details. This type of scene was de rigueur at the time: the little lesbian show, to arouse the guys for the main course. Today, this pic would be perfect in a vintage clothing website.