Skip to content
Archive of posts filed under the Cottage porn topic.

Tried at home

Differently from regular industrial porn, Realcore has a much wider palette of expression, and often decoding an image isn’t as immediate, or as obvious. Take this photo, for example:

There’s a picture in it, and there’s this unusual human type (unusual for the classic image of men in porn, but quite common) in what looks like his home – possibly with the door open? It’s day time, and this is a frame from a video. Was it a solo performance or someone else was filming? Was it meant to be a Tribute to the guy in the small picture? If so, who posted this frame in the older men newsgroup: this guy, the recipient or someone else? Was this position requested (maybe by the man in the small pic)? And if he’s about to do what I think, shouldn’t he take his glasses off?

Penis 2.0

I haven’t been posting here lately, sorry about that. But I’ve been searching for pictures as usual, also because my Rolling Stone Italy column on Alt Sex (in italian) is changing. Starting with the january issue it’ll be called Alt Sex 2.0 and it will be just images, perhaps 4 or 5 per issue – one page. This is great for a number of reasons: it makes sense conceptually, it’s gonna look great, it isn’t language based (so you can enjoy it too) and it will hopefully follow the excellent photographic tradition of the magazine. Obviously I cannot publish everything. There are some limits: erect penises and spread vaginas. I’m told this is where the world draws the line as to what is porn and what isn’t. I can certainly live without them, but my readers will miss fantastic images such as this one, or the one below (found in the bestiality newsgroup; note the very tiny horse vagina picture placed right in the middle).

There first

I’ll be at the Berlin Porn Film Festival again this year, presenting two early BDSM movies (24.10.08, 18.30, Eiszeit 2 kino). This is my presentation text:

There First
Presenting The “Slavesex” And “Pain” Movie Series

It’s very easy to be kinky in 2008: there are clubs, associations and dungeons for rent; there’s an ample and very varied filmography, covering just about any kink you can imagine; there are websites to educate and entertain you, made by real practitioners for genuinely interested people. But there was a time, not long ago, in which being into very intense kinds of love, like BDSM or extreme fetishes, was very much a niche thing. In the early eighties, the beginning of the golden era of VHS (and the shift from movie theaters to VCRs), fetish cinema was very underground. Video cameras were still low quality and most of the porno sold on VHS tapes was still shot on film.

Porno at the time was mostly fiction based, it had a plot and – unfortunately – actual acting bits. The editing, and sometimes dubbing, was often so extreme (and blatantly unlikely) that it was hard to get any feel for the situation: lousy dialogue, genital close ups, screams, the customary cumshot (not yet facial) and little else. Some german producers, like Dino, sometimes inserted some different action (like anal, pissing, or light BDSM) in mainstream features just to spice things up.

Two of the first widely distributed BDSM series, Slavesex and Pain, were spoken in German, and mostly featured a couple, plus occasionally someone else. Their screen names were Anita, or Anita Feller, or Martina S (for Sklavin), and Master Günther. It’s very difficult to gather informations about dates, but i believe it was in the early eighties. These movies were radically different from anything else on the market at that time, as far as I can tell. They had no music but strictly live sound, little or no editing, almost no close ups but much wider angles; they weren’t shot on movie sets but in what looked like a well equipped dungeon. The people weren’t “actors”, and you could tell right away: which porn actress would be hanged by her tits – and look like she’s into it? The movies obviously showed a dynamic, a relationship, and an action that would probably happen even if the camera wasn’t there. The shooting style was more documentaristic than porno, and it would occasionally zoom in to capture faces, not crotches. The overall package, from the stark boxes to the bare credits and the abrupt ends, smelled like underground, although it was very obvious that these people weren’t post-punks, didn’t listen to heavy metal or wear rubber in public: they were very much into BDSM, but regular people otherwise.

It’s hard to calculate the impact of these films on the BDSM scene, but i believe it’s huge. At the time, this was the only credible BDSM one could see in action, comfortably at home, even in smaller towns; and if it’s true that porno educates (or miseducates) people about sex, this is 10 times true for the so called niche porno. So one could guess that they showed first what BDSM (and more) was about to a large number of people in the world (including myself).

Anita/Martina then moved on to a brief but very varied solo career, appearing in quite a few German and Dutch productions during the second half of the 80s/early 90s (again, it’s very hard to gather informations on dates). She never did straight porn thou: her parts were always fetish, or outright kinky. Sometimes extremely so. There are movies, both in the Slavesex/Pain series and in othe productions, in which she performs things that probably had never been filmed before (including genuine tears and kisses on the cheeks – unheard of in porno), and some of those performances still hold as extreme after so many years (eons, if you consider the digital revolution). But this lady had class to burn, a style which to me is still unsurpassed today; at times she did look kinky, very extreme, even way over the top, but never gross or sloppy, or even nasty: she looked extra natural, just the way it should be. This woman’s filmography reads like a history of alternative sexuality of the last 15 years – but 15 years before.

The two films presented here belong to the early Slavesex/Pain series. They are shown as an example of seminal porno, as amazing films in their own right and to give credit and visibility to authors that opened a way that is very, very much in fashion in 2008 – but that they walked 25 years ago.

Size matters

One of the trademarks of classic Hardcore porno was the genital closeup shot; sometimes it looked horrible (especially when prints or movies had too much red in it, giving the image a butchery quality) but it was always there. Realcore porn, and new porno in general, seems to be more concerned with the ambience than with certifying that penetration is taking place: shots have a much wider angle, and details have a meaning within the context. But of course there are exeptions, sometimes quite remarkable.

jstnps.jpg

Justnips.com is a commercial website (one-time billing, $79 subscription for 180 days). Is it all devoted to nipples? “Although our site is JustNips.Com we photograph & videotape most models nude from head to toe (& everything in between)”. I haven’t visited the website but it looks kind of plain. I wouldn’t say the same of this image, posted a few weeks ago in a nipples Usenet Newsgroup. Notice the “repost freely – no modifications” disclaimer, almost a CC license.

The latest dolls

Some images like these where posted yesterday (march 14th) in the alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.anime newsgroup, with the subject “Worlds first Anthropomorphic Love Dolls”.

ald1.jpg

I have a million questions: are these made for play (as it seems)? Is this a micro-business or just amateur craftsmanship? Aren’t plushophiles (whose perfect companion is said to be the Mattel Meeko™) already into anthropomorphism (they’ve been around for decades, and I have amazing plush lovers images in my show)? Weren’t 70es inflatable dolls anthropomorphic too – beside the hilarious open mouth? Are these washable too?

ald2.jpg

But the posts seem very serious (although there is no text), and the email address looks like a working one. So if you’re full of questions like I am, you can try to email the author at strombolisdoll at gmail.com.

Window licker

In the early days of Realcore, let’s say before year 2.000, there were many technical fetish sites: first and foremost the BDSM ones, being some of their activities very technical and at times dangerous if not properly executed (“Don’t try this at home” is a recurring caption). But there were also more unusual tutorials, like Sexual Bricolàge, the art of building sex toys, or more complex pleasure devices, from household items. From “101 common things you can spank your partner with” (woodspoons, brushes, coat-hangers, etc.) to this:

You can see this contraption as a masturbatorial variation, or as an attempt to have sex with a bed head. The latter seems to be the interpretation of MEO, proud maker and distributor of the Door Shagger™:

With “MEO’s Door Shagger”, you will discover solo sex in a completely new manner! With two flexible attachment positions, just right for every door. If you visit their website, don’t miss the “Customers who bought this product also purchased” feature: in my case it included Butt Banger, Sucking Mouth, Steve Rambo Butt & Dong (almost modern art), Glans Ring with ball, Rubber Cock Ring, Pheromone perfume, Blindfold Hood: what a party.

Uplifting porn

We all know you can find a lot of unusual sexual images online; it’s less known that some people actually started whole new fetishes just because they weren’t anywhere else, changing their tastes every week.

This is not the case of the Lifters and Carriers: they’ve been online for ages and are even listed on Yahoo!

It’s usually larger, more muscular women, lifting and carrying smaller girls, although there are many variations on the L&C theme. You can find them all at Liftnet.net, the one stop shop for all your Lifting and Carrying needs: men, women, indoor, outdoor, in groups, on DVD: ” Blond, beautiful and athletic, Pam dressed in a hot pink bikini, poses, flexes and proceeds to lift Jeff in every which way.” ($55)

Really, really real

I came up with the definition of Realcore because reality seems to be central in this new kind of porno. in the past few years we’ve seen many sex websites advertise “real models”: Suicide Girls and Burning Angel are only the most popular (and Hippie Goddess is the funniest, to me): it’s like we’re living in some sort of porno neo-realism.

Recently I discovered another similar paysite, interesting because of the name: Nofauxxx.com. One nice thing is that they don’t have the usual categories and keep everything mixed; the images seem to be the usual assortment of goth/punk/queer, with a pleasant mix of genders. Its claim is “Hot radical porn made by ladies, queers and artists from all over the world! No Fauxxx is artistic, political and all-inclusive. Featuring models of all genders & sizes.” Nice phrase, but it could be applied to many Usenet Newsgroups, to most authentic amateur porno, as well as to all the images in this research. Despite its claim, and some nice looking people, it doesn’t even come close to the now defunct Ssspread.com, “hot femmes, studly butches and lots of genderfuck”, the very first, and yet unsurpassed (probably because it was really porno made by artists, including the smart and fabulous Barbara Degenevieve), mixed gender porno site.

Kinger size

BJ and her partner Ariel have been online ever since I can remember (mid 90es, that is). They used to post their images in various newsgroups and, for a while, they had a Yahoo! group (that might still be running); then they moved in their own domain, bjsextremesex.com (warning, strong images), and started a small business. This is the big step amateurs take when they realize there is interest about their “unique propositions”. That, in the case of BJ, are capacity and enthusiasm.

This might seem more like a simulacrum or a totem to you, but BJ can actually have fun with this and other unearthly plastic penises of similar caliber. I guess they have these toys made to measure, or perhaps they make them. Their pic and video material features mostly BJ and Ariel (both in their late forties, I’d say), defying the laws of anatomy and having a hell of a good time while doing it. Their faces are always hidden: either cut out of the images or they wear sunglasses, that hide very little and make them look like CIA agents searching for evidence in very unusual places.

No cheese, thanks

This is slightly off-topic but interesting. We’ve all heard that one can buy used underwear online. We can also guess that the most sought after used underwear could be a not very clean pair. A few years ago I found this image somewhere:

Please note the name “gift shop” (order in time for Christmas), the price of a one year membership, the pizzeria menu language and the sublime idea of a personal audio message, for just three bucks. Some things might be priceless (like working in the laundry business?), but for practically anything else there’s Mastercard, or PayPal.

PS: The japanese, that know their shit (and other fluids as well), sell similar items with an attached Polaroid of the event, to guarantee a direct and honest relation between producer and consumer.